The Dark Money Files

The Dark Money Files

If you would like to expand your AML knowledge with relevant, interesting and up to date views on the world of money laundering and its prevention, you could do worse than subscribe to the podcast hosted by Graham Barrow and his colleague Ray Blake. It’s called the ‘Dark Money Files’.

The latest episode (from 10 September 2024) deals with the potential problems caused by outsourcing any of your AML obligations, as highlighted in a recent publication by the Australian AML regulator, Austrac. They point out that outsourcing can trigger at least two types of risk:

  1. MLTF (money laundering and terrorist) risk – i.e. the risk that outsourcing could create vulnerabilities that criminals could exploit and
  2. AMLCTF Compliance Risk – i.e. the risk that your firm fails, through the outsourcing, to meet its regulatory obligations.

Also Austrac recommends that firms carry out due diligence on the outsourcing provider and suggests there may be data privacy laws that may apply.

For additional guidance, technical documents and CPD on money laundering and other accounting/audit related topics, please go to our website for:

Please go to our website for:

The Integration Stage of Money Laundering

The Integration Stage of Money Laundering

As we saw in last week’s blog money laundering is a sophisticated process where illicit funds are made to seem legal, concealing their criminal origin to infiltrate the legitimate financial system and avoid detection.

In this third and final blog in a series of three, we explore the fundamental stages of money laundering, which are:

  1. Placement
  2. Layering
  3. Integration

The three stages—placement, layering, and integration—can overlap, occur simultaneously, or occur separately, making detection difficult.

The last stage is known as ‘integration’, and this is where the illicit funds are introduced back into the financial system as ‘Cleaned’ Money.

Integration: Reintroducing the ‘Cleaned’ Money into the Economy

  1. Final Stage Explained
    • In the integration phase, the laundered money is reintroduced into the economy, appearing as legitimate business revenue.
  2. Integration Techniques
    • Property Dealing: Buying and selling property to integrate funds into the legitimate property market.
    • Front Companies: Businesses that mix illicit money with legitimate sales and services – often these are cash businesses.
    • Investments: Illicit funds are invested in legitimate business ventures and financial markets.
  3. The Role of Legal and Financial Advisors
    • Professionals in the accounting, legal and financial sectors (among others) play a critical role in either enabling or preventing the integration of laundered money and must remain alert to the possibility that by their inaction they are helping perpetrate such criminality.

The maxim prison sentence in Ireland at the moment for committing money laundering offence is 14 years.

Combating Money Laundering

  1. Global Efforts and Regulations
    • International organizations like the Financial Action Task Force establish standards and promote the effective implementation of legal, regulatory, and operational measures across the world.
  2. Technological Advances in AML
    • The use of AI and machine learning (especially in the banking sector) helps in detecting patterns consistent with money laundering activities, given the much higher volume of transactions in the financial services sector.
  3. Public and Private Sector Cooperation
    • Enhanced collaboration between governments, financial institutions, and the accountancy bodies, along with other stakeholders is essential in the fight against money laundering.

The Importance of Awareness and Training – the Implementing thorough training programs for all employees in your firm will help them recognize and report suspicious activities.

Please go to our website for:

The Layering Stage of Money Laundering

The Layering Stage of Money Laundering

As we saw in last week’s blog money laundering (ML) is a sophisticated process where illicit funds are made to seem legal, concealing their criminal origin to infiltrate the legitimate financial system and avoid detection.

In this second blog in a series of three, we explore the fundamental stages of ML, which are:

  1. Placement
  2. Layering
  3. Integration

The three stages—placement, layering, and integration—can overlap, occur simultaneously, or separately, making detection difficult.

The middle stage is known as ‘layering’, and this is where the so-called gatekeepers (accountants, solicitors, estate agents, trust and company service providers, to name but some) can become ensnared in criminal efforts that aim to disguise and distance the illicit funds from their original criminal sources.

Layering: Disguising the Trail

  1. The Complexity of Layering
    • Layering involves creating a complex series of financial transactions to obfuscate the audit trail and sever the link with the original crime.
  2. Techniques Employed – among the varied techniques used in this stage are the use of:
    • Shell Companies: Establishing companies and similar entities that act as a front to hold and move illegitimate funds legally. Accountants can be involved in approving such entities’ activities by signing off on the audited and unaudited financial statements and tax returns of such entities.
    • Electronic Transfers: Frequently moving funds between accounts across international borders.
    • Investment in High-Value Assets: Buying luxury items like Rolex watches, super expensive handbags, yachts, jewellery, antiques or real estate to help alter the form of the money.
    • Use of a legitimate business to act as a front: Legitimate cash businesses (like coffee shops, nail salons, cash for gold shops, mobile technology, or corner stores etc.), may be used to act as a ‘funnel’ for illegitimate cash (e.g. from drug sales) that is mixed in with genuine bank lodgements from the business so as not to draw unwarranted attention to the real size and nature of the business. Tell-tale red flags will include a lack of attention to important details by the proprietors such as:
  • Not having up to date business licences
  • Lack of staff training
  • Not seriously promoting the business
  • Being disinterested about staff theft or customer shoplifting.

The Importance of Awareness and Training

  1. Educational Training Programs
    • Implementing thorough training programs for all accounting firm employees at all levels to show them how to recognise and report suspicious activities is essential to preventing money laundering.
    • This training must include even back-office staff who may never meet clients, but who may see evidence of unusual patterns in the business through the transactions they process.
    • The penalties for not carrying out (and documenting) such training regularly include a 5-year prison sentence.
  2. Staff Awareness Campaigns
    • Increasing awareness about the ethics and the wider implications of ML (including the negative societal side-effects of ML such as human trafficking) among staff generally, can be most helpful.
    • In the end your firm’s reputation is what’s at stake, so keeping staff updated is one of the most important steps to secure that reputation.

Please go to our website for:

The Placement Stage of Money Laundering

The Placement Stage of Money Laundering

Money laundering is a sophisticated process where illicit funds are made to seem legal, concealing their criminal origin to infiltrate the legitimate financial system and avoid detection.

In this first blog in a series of three, we explore the fundamental stages of money laundering, which are:

  1. Placement
  2. Layering
  3. Integration

Understanding the details of these stages is vital for accountants to identify suspicious transactions and activities and assist in effective anti-money laundering (AML) efforts. The three stages—placement, layering, and integration—can overlap, occur simultaneously, or occur separately, making detection difficult.

Placement: The Initial Phase of Concealing Illicit Funds

Placement is the first phase of the money laundering process. Here, the illicit funds are introduced into the financial system, often through small deposits to avoid detection.

Some common techniques include:

  • Smurfing: This is where large amounts of money are divided into smaller, less suspicious amounts which are below the AML reporting threshold. The sums are then inserted into bank accounts or credit cards and used to pay expenses.
  • Currency Exchanges: Cash is exchanged for different currencies or financial instruments.
  • Gambling: Casinos are often used to place bets and cash out with ‘clean’ money.
  • Legitimate Trading – with criminal cash added – Adding illicit cash from a crime to the legitimate takings of a business, particularly those with little or no variable costs.
  • False invoicing using fake customers/suppliers.
  • Hiding the beneficial owner’s identity through trusts and offshore companies.
  • Customs fraud: Taking small amounts of cash below the customs declaration threshold abroad and lodging it in foreign bank accounts before being re-sent.

In fact, the list of techniques is endless.

Challenges in Detection

The variety and simplicity of initial placement techniques often makes it the most difficult stage for accountants and regulatory bodies to detect and prevent.

Combating Money Laundering

  1. Global Efforts and Regulations
    • International organisations like the FATF establish standards and promote the effective implementation of legal, regulatory, and operational measures.
  1. Technological Advances in AML
  • The use of AI and machine learning in detecting patterns consistent with money laundering activities can help flag criminal activity.
  1. Public and Private Sector Cooperation –
  • Enhancing the collaboration between governments, accountancy bodies, financial institutions, and others is essential in the fight against money laundering.

Please go to our website for:

Training for the Best Results on Your Firm’s Inspection

Training for the Best Results on Your Firm’s Inspection

An important publication that did not get sufficient attention at the time it was published in March 2024 was the Professional Standards Board Annual Report (PSD) for 2023 from the Chartered Accountants Ireland. The publication explained the following:

In 2023 the summary of the quality reviews carried out had the following results:

Quality Review Type Quality Reviews Completed in Year  

 

Satisfactory

 

 

Not Satisfactory

 

Percentage unsatisfactory

Audit 116 87 29 25%
Practice Monitoring 7 6 1 14%
Investment Business 14 14 0 0
AML UK 34 27 7 21%
AML ROI 47 44 3 6%
Insolvency GB/NI 4 4 0 0
Insolvency ROI 9 9 0 0

Overall, one in four of the audit quality review outcomes in 2023 were unsatisfactory. The most notable fact is that generally, the firms that fall into this 84% successful category are those who arrange for annual compliance reviews and always have on hand an up-to-date gap analysis of where they stand in relation to quality management and the implementation of cold file reviews.

Quality review outcomes are considered by the Quality Assurance Committee (QAC) (with the exception of UK insolvency quality reviews which are considered by the Insolvency Licensing Committee). Where quality review outcomes are not satisfactory QAC may impose conditions or restrictions on an individual or a firm (or both). Other options can include a range of measures including:

  • Monetary fine by way of regulatory penalty;
  • Enhanced monitoring via certain regulatory restrictions;
  • Licensing conditions imposed by the QAC;
  • Quality reviews being repeated more frequently than the required statutory visit cycle; and
  • Ongoing outreach (through the PSD Regulatory Bulletin, participation in CPD courses) to all firms providing current information on regulatory matters and common compliance issues.

In extreme cases, QAC may even withdraw a particular licence, registration, or authorisation, (subject, of course, to fair procedure and due process being observed).

Inspections will continue into 2024. It is in every firm’s best interest to avoid receiving an unsatisfactory review. Firms that carry out annual compliance reviews generally get better results on their inspections, so a firm would do well to implement this practice. Your annual compliance review is your firm’s equivalent of an athlete training at the gym to get the best results when they are most needed.

For more on the whole audit quality management (ISQM) process please see our ISQM 1 Toolkit here.

Please go to our website for: