Professional Judgement – Guidance from the Financial Reporting Council (Part 2)

Professional Judgement – Guidance from the Financial Reporting Council (Part 2)

Following on from last week’s blog about the Financial Reporting Council publication on professional judgement, today we look at the final three biases mentioned in Professional Judgement Guidance. Awareness of these factors allows auditors to make more objective professional judgements and maintain a higher overall quality of work.

The Financial Reporting Council publication looks at six biases (taken from International Standard on Auditing (Ireland) 220 (Revised December 2021), ‘Quality Management for an Audit of Financial Statements’, paragraph A35 which states that the six biases set out here are not intended to be a complete list of all biases that could affect audit judgements, just an illustrative list of some that might be especially relevant.

The last three biases alert auditors to be aware of:

  1. Groupthink: a tendency to think or make decisions as a group that discourages creativity or individual responsibility.
  2. Overconfidence: a tendency to overestimate one’s own ability to make accurate assessments of risk or other judgements or decisions.
  3. Automation bias: a tendency to favor output generated from automated systems, even when human reasoning or contradictory information raises questions as to whether such output is reliable or fit for purpose.

The following example given in the publication helps illustrate how these types of bias affect professional judgement.

Example: A trainee auditor is using automated tools, specifically audit data analytics, in the identification of high-risk journal entries. She uses the program’s default selection parameters, without tailoring them based on the entity and its environment. The generated selection of “high-risk” journal entries includes several items categorised as such due to having been posted at the weekend by members of the finance team.

The trainee auditor knows from her prior work on the audit that the finance team often works weekends, especially at month-end, and thus she ought not to take the output of the analytic at face value. However, the trainee auditor places a lot of weight on the fact that a specialised piece of software deemed the journal entries unusual, and plans to perform further procedures over all of these journal entries. This is an example of automation bias, because she relies on the system output without considering whether her wider understanding might imply it is not fit for purpose.

Finally, the FRC publication encourages auditors to cultivate qualities to proactively support effective professional judgement, especially self-awareness, perceptiveness, listening skills, and willingness to consult with others.

To hear more about the latest AML developments and how to be on the alert for suspicions of money laundering and terrorist financing under the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts 2010 to 2021, see our latest Anti-Money Laundering webinar here.

All our CPD courses are listed here including our Audit Update webinar .

Please also go to our website to see our:

  • Anti-Money Laundering Policies Controls & Procedures Manual (March 2022) – View the Table of Contents click here.
  • AML Webinar (December 2023) available here, which accompanies the AML Manual. It explains the latest legal AML reporting position for accountancy firms and includes a quiz. Upon completion, you receive a CPD Certificate of attendance in your inbox.
  • letters of engagement and similar templates. Please visit our site here where immediate downloads are available in Word format. A bulk discount is available for orders of five or more items if bought together.
  • ISQM TOOLKIT or if you prefer to chat through the different audit risks and potential appropriate responses presented by this new standard, please contact John McCarthy FCA by e-mail at john@jmcc.ie.
  • We typically tailor ISQM training and brainstorming sessions to suit your firm’s unique requirements. The ISQM TOOLKIT 2022 is available to purchase here.
Professional Judgement – Guidance from the Financial Reporting Council (Part 1)

Professional Judgement – Guidance from the Financial Reporting Council (Part 1)

Making professional judgements is one of the most crucial and frequent tasks of an auditor. Failure to consistently practice good professional judgement can lead to a significant decrease in audit quality; therefore, it is essential to have an effective methodology for making professional judgements. In 2022 the Financial Reporting Council published guidance entitled Professional Judgement Guidance to address the key aspects which ought to be considered in every professional judgement.

One key aspect discussed in the document is “Mindset,” particularly understanding biases and other relevant psychological factors which can subconsciously hinder logical reasoning.

The Financial Reporting Council publication looks at six biases (taken from International Standard on Auditing (Ireland) 220 (Revised December 2021), ‘Quality Management for an Audit of Financial Statements’, paragraph A35 which states that the six biases set out here are not intended to be a complete list of all biases that could affect audit judgements, just an illustrative list of some that might be especially relevant.

The first three biases alert auditors to be aware of:

  1. Availability bias: a tendency to place more weight on events or experiences that immediately come to mind or are readily available than on those that are not.
  2. Confirmation bias: a tendency to place more weight on information that corroborates an existing belief than information that contradicts or casts doubt on that belief.
  3. Anchoring bias: a tendency to use an initial piece of information as an anchor against which subsequent information is inadequately assessed.

To illustrate anchoring bias, the FRC uses the example of an audit senior manager tasked with determining performance materiality for a company’s current year’s engagement. He starts by looking at the audit file from the prior year and sees that the engagement team set performance materiality at 75% of materiality; however, he is aware that a higher than expected number of misstatements were identified in the prior year, and that the control environment remains relatively weak. To compensate for this he resolves to choose a lower percentage of materiality for performance materiality, setting it at 70% of materiality.

His judgement here may have been affected by anchoring bias, if he put undue weight on the initial piece of information gathered, namely the prior year figure. If he had started from a broader consideration of the entity and its environment and a range of factors that affect the expected level of misstatements in the current year, he may have arrived at a different figure.

Awareness of biases such as these can help auditors avoid falling into these traps, and thus enables the auditor to make more objective professional judgements.

We will cover the last three biases in next week’s blog.

To hear more about the latest AML developments and how to be on the alert for suspicions of money laundering and terrorist financing under the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts 2010 to 2021, see our latest Anti-Money Laundering webinar here.

All our courses are listed here.

Please also go to our website to see our:

  • Anti-Money Laundering Policies Controls & Procedures Manual (March 2022) – View the Table of Contents click here.
  • AML Webinar (December 2023) available here, which accompanies the AML Manual. It explains the latest legal AML reporting position for accountancy firms and includes a quiz. Upon completion, you receive a CPD Certificate of attendance in your inbox.
  • letters of engagement and similar templates. Please visit our site here where immediate downloads are available in Word format. A bulk discount is available for orders of five or more items if bought together.
  • ISQM TOOLKIT or if you prefer to chat through the different audit risks and potential appropriate responses presented by this new standard, please contact John McCarthy FCA by e-mail at john@jmcc.ie.
  • We typically tailor ISQM training and brainstorming sessions to suit your firm’s unique requirements. The ISQM TOOLKIT 2022 is available to purchase here.
New FRS 102 is Here

New FRS 102 is Here

Revenue recognition and lease accounting rules are the main changes from January 2026 arising from newly published amendments to FRS 102.

On 27th March the Financial Reporting Council published a 285 page list of the Amendments to FRS 102, FRS 105 and other FRSs. These changes will come into force from 1 January 2026 with early adoption allowed, provided all the changes are adopted simultaneously.

The changes are too extensive to be covered in this short blog but here is a flavour of what’s changing.

An earlier effective date (among changes in other FRS) applies to new disclosures about supplier finance arrangements in Section 7 of FRS 102 ‘Statement of Cash Flows’ for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2025, with early application permitted.

Where an entity adopts these amendments early:

  • In the UK it shall disclose that fact (regardless of entity size), while,
  • Small entities in the Republic of Ireland, are encouraged to disclose that fact.

Revenue Recognition -the main change is the use of the 5 step model from (IFRS 15) which will impact businesses that have contracts that bundle goods and services with variable consideration, warranties, customer options or significant financing components. It’s unlikely that this will impact most SMEs that much. No restatement of comparatives is required on transition.

Lease accounting – lessors will see little change, but for lessees there are major changes. Right of use assets (RoU) (as defined) are to be capitalised on the balance sheet as a RoU asset with a corresponding liability.

There are exemptions for certain:

  • short term leases (defined as a lease that, at the commencement date, has a lease term of 12 months or less. A lease that contains a purchase option is not a short-term lease; and
  • low value assets – defined more in terms of what they are not than what they are. The FRS gives a list of what are not on the list including cars, buses, trucks, tractors, land and buildings.

Such leases will still be treated as operating leases, taking the lease expense to profit or loss and a finance charge on the lease liability.

Like the transition rules on revenue recognition no restatement of comparatives is required on transition to the new leasing provisions.

The main impact of the leasing changes will be that EBITDA measures will change because the operating lease expense is replaced by depreciation on the asset and interest occurring on the unwinding of the corresponding lease liability as the lease is paid. For some businesses this may have a negative impact on debt covenants involving EBITDA measures.

The Financial Reporting Council will issue updated Staff Factsheets and the actual Standards themselves later in 2024.  It’s hoped that by having an implementation period of 21 months before the effective date rather than the original promise of ‘at least 12 months’, the extended period will provide a bit more breathing space for users.

To hear more about the latest AML developments and how to be on the alert for suspicions of money laundering and terrorist financing under the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts 2010 to 2021, see our latest Anti-Money Laundering webinar here.

All our courses are listed here.

Please also go to our website to see our:

  • Anti-Money Laundering Policies Controls & Procedures Manual (March 2022) – View the Table of Contents click here.
  • AML Webinar (December 2023) available here, which accompanies the AML Manual. It explains the latest legal AML reporting position for accountancy firms and includes a quiz. Upon completion, you receive a CPD Certificate of attendance in your inbox.
  • letters of engagement and similar templates. Please visit our site here where immediate downloads are available in Word format. A bulk discount is available for orders of five or more items if bought together.
  • ISQM TOOLKIT or if you prefer to chat through the different audit risks and potential appropriate responses presented by this new standard, please contact John McCarthy FCA by e-mail at john@jmcc.ie.
  • We typically tailor ISQM training and brainstorming sessions to suit your firm’s unique requirements. The ISQM TOOLKIT 2022 is available to purchase here.
New AML Guidance from the CCAB-I

New AML Guidance from the CCAB-I

On Friday 4 March 2022 the Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies in Ireland (CCAB-I) issued updated guidance applicable to accountants in practice for immediate use.

The Guidance is a widely respected and hugely valuable document among accountants as it sets out the minimum criteria that must be adhered to in order to comply with the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts 2010 to 2021 (‘the Act’) in the Republic of Ireland.

Key changes in the legislation are reflected in additional guidance in areas such as:

  • Greater emphasis on identification of beneficial owners of businesses;
  • Expanding the definition of tax adviser, letting agent and intermediaries at art auctions;
  • The definition of a Politically Exposed Person (PEP) to include any individual performing a prescribed function;
  • There is a specific list of enhanced due diligence measures that the designated person is required to apply when dealing with a customer established, or residing, in a High-risk third country;
  • The new requirement in place since 23 April 2021 that prior to commencing a business relationship is established, reasonable steps must be taken to verify the beneficial ownership of corporate clients including confirming the beneficial ownership with the relevant Central Register. Where a Designated person identifies a ‘discrepancy’ (as defined) in the Act, i.e. where the entry is inconsistent or incorrect between its own records and those maintained by the Central Register, it must notify the relevant Registrar.
  • There is a similar requirement to notify the relevant Registrar where there is evidence of ‘non-compliance’ (as defined) in the Act, i.e. where the register is blank, it must notify the relevant Registrar.

A copy of the guidance may be accessed here.

Specially tailored up to date AML Training that meets the requirements of the legislation is available on request, on Zoom, in person or as a hybrid event, with a free video recording supplied afterwards, for future viewing. Contact john@jmcc.ie for further details.

To ensure your letters of engagement and similar templates are up to date visit our site here where immediate downloads are available in Word format. A bulk discount is available for orders of five or more items if bought together.

For our latest Audit Quality Control Manual (October 2021) (implementing the latest Irish Audit & Accounting Supervisory Authority standards including ISQC1 on audit quality control) click here. View the Table of Contents here.

We also have an up to date Anti-Money Laundering Procedures Manual (September 2021) – View the Table of Contents click here.

New Style Cuckooing

New Style Cuckooing

Have you checked what companies are registered at your office address, lately? Well, maybe now is a good time!

Police sometimes describe the practice by which drug dealers take over someone’s home (often a vulnerable person) as a base for their activities as ‘cuckooing’. It now appears that this phenomenon has ‘come home to roost’ in some accountancy firms – at least in the UK.

According to a 2021 report in the SARS in Action magazine of the National Crimes Agency the new style of cuckoo uses an accountancy firm’s address as a registered office address without the knowledge or consent of the firm.

The most likely explanation for using the accountancy firm’s address is that it provides credibility which may be used to facilitate fraud. In many cases, the company will combine using the address with a Post Office redirection arrangement so the accountancy firm will not receive any mail which might trigger an investigation.

And it gets worse. Sean Kavanagh from leading company formation agency, Company Formations International in Ballsbridge explains that it is impossible to have a fraudulent Registered Office removed from your address as the CRO do not have any legislative basis for doing so, and therefore don’t.

CRO personnel went before the Oireachtas Committee for Enterprise, Trade and Employment to discuss this and other anomalies including full blown identity theft in December 2021. We still await some positive developments from this meeting.

You have been warned!

To ensure your letters of engagement and similar templates are up to date visit our site here where immediate downloads are available in Word format. A bulk discount is available for orders of five or more items if bought together.

For our latest Audit Quality Control Manual (October 2021) (implementing the latest Irish Audit & Accounting Supervisory Authority standards including ISQC1 on audit quality control) click here. View the Table of Contents here.

We also have an up to date Anti-Money Laundering Procedures Manual (September 2021) – View the Table of Contents click here.