Common Issues Arising on AML Monitoring Visits

Common Issues Arising on AML Monitoring Visits

The various professional bodies are ramping up their anti-money laundering (AML) inspection regime, as there is more and more pressure coming at EU level, on professional bodies, to improve the consistency of the inspection system.

The main issues that are arising for Irish firms on recent AML inspections are:

  1. Lack of written procedures which evidence that firms are complying with AML regulations and legislation. These procedures ideally consist of an up to date AML Policies & Procedures Manual. Many firms have such policies and procedures already in place, but they are often out of date and do not clearly identify the MLRO. The latest changes to legislation came into effect on 23 April 2021 and the up to date AML Policies & Procedures Manual in use in the firm should reflect this.
  2. Client due diligence (CDD) – this consists of the following parts:
    1. Client verification – the ID obtained has not been signed and dated by the firm to evidence that they are ‘Certified Copies of the Originals’.
    2. Details of the client’s business, legal structure, sources of funds and geographic risks are often not properly recorded.
    3. Risk assessment and CDD procedures are not carried out prior to acting for the client.
  3. Firm-Wide Risk Assessment (often referred to as the Business-Wide Risk Assessment) – there is often little evidence that this written assessment (introduced in law since November 2018) has been completed or where it has been completed, the assessment is often not sufficiently detailed or up to date in accordance with Section 30A of the ‘Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts, 2010 to 2021’
  4. AML Compliance ReviewAnnual compliance review not completed or a inadequate review has been carried out. The review findings and implementation plan are extremely important. We carry out such external documented reviews for firms with advice on corrective action.
  5. Training – Appropriate AML training has not been undertaken by all relevant staff. We provide in-house and online AML Training delivered in a format tailored to each firm’s requirements.
  6. Annual Return declarations – Incorrect AML information disclosed on the firm’s Annual Return to its professional body. Attention to detail is important here and this will be reviewed as part of the AML Compliance Review we carry out.

 

ODCE Annual Report 2020

ODCE Annual Report 2020

The Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement (ODCE) recently published their Annual Report for 2020.

The section on the reporting by auditors of indictable offences, makes interesting reading, especially the fact that the greatest increase in reports for any category, has been to do with the falsification of books or documents. This particular category of offence is up from one incidence in 2019 to three in 2020. Perhaps connected with Covid?

The below table has the details. It should be noted that the number of reports received by the ODCE does not accord with the number of suspected offences reported as, in several instances, the report received includes reference to more than one suspected offence

These types of offence rarely occur in isolation and are often connected with money laundering, because the lack of/falsification of accounting records can often be used to conceal the money laundering activity. Where money laundering is suspected there is a requirement for simultaneous reporting to An Garda Síochana and Revenue, a topic we discussed in an earlier blog.

You can download and read the full ODCE report here.

For more about accountants’ AML compliance obligations, see our AML Policies, Controls & Procedures Manual for 2021.

The Manual contains all the latest requirements relevant to accountants contained in the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts 2010 to 2021 now fully in force.

For more blogs please visit this link and for our publications and manuals and services click on the hyperlinked words.

In excess of 100 companies registered at Dublin family home

In excess of 100 companies registered at Dublin family home

A recent article by the Independent revealed that a Rathfarnham family home address had been used in the registration of over 100 companies. See the full article here.

The article reports that two tenants resident at the address, had use the owner’s address without his knowledge.  This highlights a major weakness in the CRO’s procedures for company set up where the trust placed in the ‘self-declaration’ process has been found wanting.

The Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement (ODCE) and An Garda Siochana were contacted by the homeowner.

A spokesperson for the Department of Enterprise Trade and Employment which oversees the CRO confirmed that the CRO does not verify the identities of directors or secretaries of companies.

This latest development calls into question the serious lack of background verification carried out by the CRO which ensures that the Office never calls into question instances where multiple addresses are listed for the same director, not to mention the increased risk that these businesses could be used for money laundering activity.

A similar problem exists at UK Companies House where a consultation has been carried out called the ‘Corporate transparency and register reform’. Proposals include making companies using the FRS 105/102 accounts frameworks in the UK, declare their turnover, among other recommendations, to help verify that they genuinely qualify for these much reduced disclosure regimes. The results of the consultation have not yet been announced, but similar moves be follow in Ireland.

 

For more about accountants’ AML compliance obligations, see our AML Policies, Controls & Procedures Manual for 2021.

 

The Manual contains all the latest requirements relevant to accountants contained in the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts 2010 to 2021 now fully in force.  Future blogs will look at various parts of the new and existing provisions of this legislation.

 

For more blogs please visit this link and for our publications and manuals and services click here.

 

The New AML Regulator for Europe

The New AML Regulator for Europe

The European Union has for some time, been trying to work out how best to combat financial crime that impacts EU finances.

Formally launched on 1 June this year, a new office, the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) has been created. It was first established in 2017 with powers to investigate and prosecute crimes against the EU’s financial interests including money laundering.

The mandate of the EPPO’s is ‘to investigate, prosecute and bring to court crimes against EU budgets, such as fraud, corruption or serious cross-border VAT fraud’.

The EPPO’s Chief Prosecutor is Laura Codruța Kövesi, the former Chief Prosecutor of Romania’s National Anticorruption Directorate and former Romanian Prosecutor General.

Here is an interview with the new Chief Prosecutor.

The remaining EPPO staff consists of two Chief Deputies and other prosecutors drawn from the 22 participating EU countries.  Unfortunately, Ireland is not participating in the EPPO along with Denmark, Hungary, Poland and Sweden. Sweden is said to join in 2022. Ireland have, however, signed up to the PIF Directive (2017/1371) which protects against the misuse of EU funds, and protecting EU taxpayer’s money. Ireland have the option to join the EPPO at any time.

The EPPO already faces a mountain of work, with over 3,000 reports submitted for action.  According to Kövesi, the first new reports of alleged fraud against the EU budget, were submitted from Italy and Germany and arrived within hours of the EPPO’s online reporting system going ‘live.’ We wish Laura and her team success in the fight against financial crime.

For more about accountants’ AML compliance obligations, see our AML Policies, Controls & Procedures Manual for 2021.

The Manual contains all the latest requirements relevant to accountants contained in the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts 2010 to 2021 now fully in force.  Future blogs will look at various parts of the new and existing provisions of this legislation.

 

For more blogs please visit this link and for our publications and manuals and services click here.

 

Beneficial Ownership – more consistency needed in the EU

Beneficial Ownership – more consistency needed in the EU

In a May 2021 report by Transparency International (TI) called ‘Access Denied? Availability and Accessibility of Beneficial Ownership Data in The European Union’ the authors explain how the great majority of countries across the European Union (24 out of 27) have a private central beneficial ownership information register in place. The three that do not are Italy, Hungary and Lithuania.

Access to the registers varies a lot across Member states and while some charge an access fee, others charge a fee, the most expensive being Sweden at €27 per request.

In Denmark, one may check all the companies on the register with the same beneficial owner as well as all companies registered at a given address. It is also possible to search by company (exact name or parts of the name) and by beneficial owner.

It’s a pity that the UK is excluded from the report’s findings which, only deal with EU Member states. Nevertheless it’s a very useful tool to help MLROs track beneficial ownership data of their clients.

The report is free of charge and may be accessed here.

For more about accountants’ AML compliance obligations, see our AML Policies, Controls & Procedures Manual for 2021.

The Manual contains all the latest requirements relevant to accountants contained in the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts 2010 to 2021 now fully in force.  Future blogs will look at various parts of the new and existing provisions of this legislation.

For more blogs please visit this link and for our publications and manuals and services click here.

Low Levels of Suspicious Transaction Reports

Low Levels of Suspicious Transaction Reports

According to statistics quoted by Chartered Accountants Ireland recently, there are over 2,100 entities registered to make reports on the GoAML website of the Garda Síochana. This is one of the two websites where anti-money laundering (AML) reports must be made in Ireland. The other being the Revenue Commissioners www.ros.ie website. However the surprising aspect of this is that there are only 194 accountants/auditors on this list.

Each of these firms should be registered on the GoAML site in order to make reports of suspicious transactions involving money laundering. In 2020 there were over 29,000 reports of money laundering suspicions from many industry sectors, to the Garda/Revenue Commissioners.

According to the latest Profile of the Profession report from the Irish Audit & Accounting Supervisory Authority, there were 1,155 statutory audit firms approved to carry out audits in Ireland that had offices in Ireland. Even if a firm has no report to make at the moment, it’s still a good idea to register to be able to access knowledge and information provided by the Garda Financial Intelligence Unit.

This does not even represent the total population of potential registrants, as there are many practicing firms of accountants in Ireland that no longer need audit registration, but will have AML responsibilities, as the law affects all accountants who are principals in firms in practice. The numbers of these non-audit firms are harder to assess, because they would also include bookkeepers as well as those entities specialising in payroll and similar accountancy-related back-office activities. Let’s make an educated guess that there are around 2,000 firms of accountants/bookkeepers in total in Ireland, including audit firms.

The percentage registered is therefore under 10% of the total of potential firms of accountants/auditors that ought to be registered, so it’s no wonder the volume of money laundering reports from accountants annually in Ireland, is so low.

Elsewhere it was reported by the AccountingWebUK in April 2019 that ‘26% of accountants surveyed in the UK, did not have an assigned MLRO in their firm.’ It is one of the requirements of Irish/UK AML law to appoint a ‘nominated officer’ (commonly called the MLRO or Money Laundering Reporting Officer), with ultimate responsibility for the implementation of anti-money laundering policies and training.

For more about accountants’ AML compliance obligations, see our AML Policies, Controls & Procedures Manual for 2021.

The Manual contains all the latest requirements relevant to accountants contained in the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts 2010 to 2021 now fully in force.  Future blogs will look at various parts of the new and existing provisions of this legislation.

For more blogs please visit this link and for our publications and manuals and services click here.