ODCE Annual Report 2020

ODCE Annual Report 2020

The Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement (ODCE) recently published their Annual Report for 2020.

The section on the reporting by auditors of indictable offences, makes interesting reading, especially the fact that the greatest increase in reports for any category, has been to do with the falsification of books or documents. This particular category of offence is up from one incidence in 2019 to three in 2020. Perhaps connected with Covid?

The below table has the details. It should be noted that the number of reports received by the ODCE does not accord with the number of suspected offences reported as, in several instances, the report received includes reference to more than one suspected offence

These types of offence rarely occur in isolation and are often connected with money laundering, because the lack of/falsification of accounting records can often be used to conceal the money laundering activity. Where money laundering is suspected there is a requirement for simultaneous reporting to An Garda Síochana and Revenue, a topic we discussed in an earlier blog.

You can download and read the full ODCE report here.

For more about accountants’ AML compliance obligations, see our AML Policies, Controls & Procedures Manual for 2021.

The Manual contains all the latest requirements relevant to accountants contained in the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts 2010 to 2021 now fully in force.

For more blogs please visit this link and for our publications and manuals and services click on the hyperlinked words.

In excess of 100 companies registered at Dublin family home

In excess of 100 companies registered at Dublin family home

A recent article by the Independent revealed that a Rathfarnham family home address had been used in the registration of over 100 companies. See the full article here.

The article reports that two tenants resident at the address, had use the owner’s address without his knowledge.  This highlights a major weakness in the CRO’s procedures for company set up where the trust placed in the ‘self-declaration’ process has been found wanting.

The Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement (ODCE) and An Garda Siochana were contacted by the homeowner.

A spokesperson for the Department of Enterprise Trade and Employment which oversees the CRO confirmed that the CRO does not verify the identities of directors or secretaries of companies.

This latest development calls into question the serious lack of background verification carried out by the CRO which ensures that the Office never calls into question instances where multiple addresses are listed for the same director, not to mention the increased risk that these businesses could be used for money laundering activity.

A similar problem exists at UK Companies House where a consultation has been carried out called the ‘Corporate transparency and register reform’. Proposals include making companies using the FRS 105/102 accounts frameworks in the UK, declare their turnover, among other recommendations, to help verify that they genuinely qualify for these much reduced disclosure regimes. The results of the consultation have not yet been announced, but similar moves be follow in Ireland.

 

For more about accountants’ AML compliance obligations, see our AML Policies, Controls & Procedures Manual for 2021.

 

The Manual contains all the latest requirements relevant to accountants contained in the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts 2010 to 2021 now fully in force.  Future blogs will look at various parts of the new and existing provisions of this legislation.

 

For more blogs please visit this link and for our publications and manuals and services click here.

 

The New AML Regulator for Europe

The New AML Regulator for Europe

The European Union has for some time, been trying to work out how best to combat financial crime that impacts EU finances.

Formally launched on 1 June this year, a new office, the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) has been created. It was first established in 2017 with powers to investigate and prosecute crimes against the EU’s financial interests including money laundering.

The mandate of the EPPO’s is ‘to investigate, prosecute and bring to court crimes against EU budgets, such as fraud, corruption or serious cross-border VAT fraud’.

The EPPO’s Chief Prosecutor is Laura Codruța Kövesi, the former Chief Prosecutor of Romania’s National Anticorruption Directorate and former Romanian Prosecutor General.

Here is an interview with the new Chief Prosecutor.

The remaining EPPO staff consists of two Chief Deputies and other prosecutors drawn from the 22 participating EU countries.  Unfortunately, Ireland is not participating in the EPPO along with Denmark, Hungary, Poland and Sweden. Sweden is said to join in 2022. Ireland have, however, signed up to the PIF Directive (2017/1371) which protects against the misuse of EU funds, and protecting EU taxpayer’s money. Ireland have the option to join the EPPO at any time.

The EPPO already faces a mountain of work, with over 3,000 reports submitted for action.  According to Kövesi, the first new reports of alleged fraud against the EU budget, were submitted from Italy and Germany and arrived within hours of the EPPO’s online reporting system going ‘live.’ We wish Laura and her team success in the fight against financial crime.

For more about accountants’ AML compliance obligations, see our AML Policies, Controls & Procedures Manual for 2021.

The Manual contains all the latest requirements relevant to accountants contained in the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts 2010 to 2021 now fully in force.  Future blogs will look at various parts of the new and existing provisions of this legislation.

 

For more blogs please visit this link and for our publications and manuals and services click here.

 

Beneficial Ownership – more consistency needed in the EU

Beneficial Ownership – more consistency needed in the EU

In a May 2021 report by Transparency International (TI) called ‘Access Denied? Availability and Accessibility of Beneficial Ownership Data in The European Union’ the authors explain how the great majority of countries across the European Union (24 out of 27) have a private central beneficial ownership information register in place. The three that do not are Italy, Hungary and Lithuania.

Access to the registers varies a lot across Member states and while some charge an access fee, others charge a fee, the most expensive being Sweden at €27 per request.

In Denmark, one may check all the companies on the register with the same beneficial owner as well as all companies registered at a given address. It is also possible to search by company (exact name or parts of the name) and by beneficial owner.

It’s a pity that the UK is excluded from the report’s findings which, only deal with EU Member states. Nevertheless it’s a very useful tool to help MLROs track beneficial ownership data of their clients.

The report is free of charge and may be accessed here.

For more about accountants’ AML compliance obligations, see our AML Policies, Controls & Procedures Manual for 2021.

The Manual contains all the latest requirements relevant to accountants contained in the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts 2010 to 2021 now fully in force.  Future blogs will look at various parts of the new and existing provisions of this legislation.

For more blogs please visit this link and for our publications and manuals and services click here.

Low Levels of Suspicious Transaction Reports

Low Levels of Suspicious Transaction Reports

According to statistics quoted by Chartered Accountants Ireland recently, there are over 2,100 entities registered to make reports on the GoAML website of the Garda Síochana. This is one of the two websites where anti-money laundering (AML) reports must be made in Ireland. The other being the Revenue Commissioners www.ros.ie website. However the surprising aspect of this is that there are only 194 accountants/auditors on this list.

Each of these firms should be registered on the GoAML site in order to make reports of suspicious transactions involving money laundering. In 2020 there were over 29,000 reports of money laundering suspicions from many industry sectors, to the Garda/Revenue Commissioners.

According to the latest Profile of the Profession report from the Irish Audit & Accounting Supervisory Authority, there were 1,155 statutory audit firms approved to carry out audits in Ireland that had offices in Ireland. Even if a firm has no report to make at the moment, it’s still a good idea to register to be able to access knowledge and information provided by the Garda Financial Intelligence Unit.

This does not even represent the total population of potential registrants, as there are many practicing firms of accountants in Ireland that no longer need audit registration, but will have AML responsibilities, as the law affects all accountants who are principals in firms in practice. The numbers of these non-audit firms are harder to assess, because they would also include bookkeepers as well as those entities specialising in payroll and similar accountancy-related back-office activities. Let’s make an educated guess that there are around 2,000 firms of accountants/bookkeepers in total in Ireland, including audit firms.

The percentage registered is therefore under 10% of the total of potential firms of accountants/auditors that ought to be registered, so it’s no wonder the volume of money laundering reports from accountants annually in Ireland, is so low.

Elsewhere it was reported by the AccountingWebUK in April 2019 that ‘26% of accountants surveyed in the UK, did not have an assigned MLRO in their firm.’ It is one of the requirements of Irish/UK AML law to appoint a ‘nominated officer’ (commonly called the MLRO or Money Laundering Reporting Officer), with ultimate responsibility for the implementation of anti-money laundering policies and training.

For more about accountants’ AML compliance obligations, see our AML Policies, Controls & Procedures Manual for 2021.

The Manual contains all the latest requirements relevant to accountants contained in the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts 2010 to 2021 now fully in force.  Future blogs will look at various parts of the new and existing provisions of this legislation.

For more blogs please visit this link and for our publications and manuals and services click here.

Oops Non-Compliance

Oops Non-Compliance

In last week’s blog we alerted readers to the first of the two types of anomaly that ‘designated persons’ are obliged to notify to the relevant registration authority:

  • A discrepancy – there is an error on the Beneficial ownership Register; or
  • Non-compliance – the Beneficial Ownership details on the register are blank (we believe this to be the case for approximately 20% of obliged entities).

This week we explain what to do if you uncover non-compliance.  Having appointed an RBO Liaison Officer – (see last week’s blog for the detailed steps to do this using a BEN3A Form), then the non-compliance can be reported to the Registrar of Beneficial Ownership using Form NCN.

A Non-Compliance Notice (Form NCN) is where, having searched for the beneficial ownership details of a particular entity, the person searching has found that no beneficial ownership details have been filed, and is then obliged to formally notify the Registrar that the entity in question appears to have failed to file the correct information with the RBO in accordance with Regulations 20 and 21 of SI 110/2019. Form NCN may be downloaded from the RBO website at the link given here.

Only a ‘designated person’ as defined in Section 25, Criminal Justice (Money Laundering & Terrorist Financing) Act, 2010 (as amended), is entitled to report a discrepancy to the Registrar. This is usually the Money Laundering Reporting Officer. However a ‘non-compliance’ matter may be reported by anyone, including, but not necessarily the RBO Liaison Officer. In practice non-compliance will probably be notified by the MLRO.

I have to ask the question – why doesn’t the Registrar already know where the blanks are and why is there a requirement to notify these when they ought to be obvious from the RBO database? Answers on a postcard please……..?

For more about these obligations, see our AML Policies, Controls & Procedures Manual for 2021.

The Manual contains all the latest requirements relevant to accountants contained in the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts 2010 to 2021 now fully in force.  Future blogs will look at various parts of the new and existing provisions of this legislation.

For more blogs please visit this link and for our publications and manuals and services click here.