by John McCarthy Consulting Ltd. | Jan 14, 2020 | Blog, News
A question that I often get asked is: how are changes in depreciation policy accounted for?
The follow up question usually asked is whether such changes are accounted for prospectively or retrospectively under FRS 102?
The answer, however, depends on whether the change is a change in ‘estimate’ or a change in accounting ‘policy’.
Change in accounting estimate
Whilst commonly referred to as a ‘depreciation policy’, the depreciation method used is actually an accounting estimate (as detailed in FRS 102 paragraph 17.23).
For example, an entity changing from the reducing balance method to a straight line basis of depreciation, should account for this as a change in accounting estimate, in line with FRS 102 paragraph 10.16, by applying the change prospectively from the date of the change.
Both the useful life and residual value of an asset are accounting estimates. These estimates should be reviewed and updated, where necessary, in accordance with FRS 102 paragraph 17.19. Any amendments to either useful life or residual value are also applied prospectively from the date of change.
Change of accounting policy
When an entity decides to change where a depreciation charge is presented in the accounts, for example, changing its classification from cost of sales to administrative expenses, this would be deemed to be a change of accounting policy (unless, for example, there is a change in circumstance e.g. because of a change in production methods, meaning that the asset is now being used in a different way – in which case the change in presentation would be actioned prospectively from the date of change).
Under FRS 102 paragraph 10.8, this change must result in the financial statements providing reliable and more relevant information about the effects of transactions on the entity’s financial position or performance. When this criteria is met, entities should account for this change in accounting policy retrospectively and therefore the relevant depreciation charge for the prior period should also be reclassified.
If ever in doubt about the applicable rule in the case of your technical question please e-mail us at john@jmcc.ie and we will let you know if there is a charge for your technical question and how long it will take us to generate a reply. Usually technical questions are answered in 48 hours.
For more in technical accounting topics see our online webinars accessible for up to one year from date of purchase. There are 20 topics available and more are added all the time.
Topics include Investment Property Accounting, FRS 105, Common Errors in FRS 102 Accounting and the latest on FRS 105 and company law, visit our online webinar training website. Once viewing is completed, customers will receive a CPD Certificate confirming their learning.
See also our on-demand webinars on AML, accessible at any time and the new requirement for the AML Business Risk Assessment.
by John McCarthy Consulting Ltd. | Dec 18, 2019 | Blog, News
A new requirement – to protect firms against the risk of money laundering – came into law last year, but many firms may not yet have prepared the relevant document.
The Fourth Money Laundering Directive (2015/849/EC) was transposed into Irish legislation in November 2018 by way of the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing), (Amendment) Act, 2018 (the “2018 Act”).
One of the main changes introduced by the 2018 Act is that it introduces the requirement in Section 30A to carry out and document a Firm-Wide Business Risk Assessment of the business/firm itself.
To assist accounting entities, we have prepared a Word template which retails for €60+VAT, available at this link.
We have also produced a 44 minute webinar on how to prepare the Firm Wide Business Risk Assessment.
If you have already prepared the document, it may need updated for changes to any of the five key areas listed below.
Our Firm-Wide Business Risk Assessment template is pre-populated with some text to help you prepare the document. You simply remove the example text and insert text that is more appropriate concentrating on the five key areas that under Section 30A. These are:
-
- Clients of the firm – who are they;
- Products and services provided – how might they be abused for money laundering;
- Countries that our clients operate in and which may present certain geographic risks;
- Transactions we are involved in (e.g. certain clients’ money and similar transactions may pose additional risk); and
- Delivery channels e.g. do we always meet our clients face to face? If you do, this would be a risk mitigating factor.
The document is based on the professional guidance produced by the CCAB in its document called the CCAB-I Technical Release 01/2019.
Please find links here to our:
- Webinar on AML Business-Wide Risk Assessment – €45
- Word template containing all the guidance you should need to prepare the Business Risk Assessment – €60+VAT
Our new fully updated AML Policies & Procedures Manual includes a section that fully deals with these requirements and is now available here. The Manual is updated for the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts, 2010 to 2018 which came into force on 26 November 2018. It retails at €150+VAT.
See also further on-demand webinars on AML, accessible at any time.
Other webinar topics include Investment Property Accounting, FRS 105, Common Errors in FRS 102 Accounting and the latest on FRS 105 and company law, visit our online webinar training website.
Once viewing is completed, customers will receive a CPD Certificate confirming their learning.
by John McCarthy Consulting Ltd. | Dec 4, 2019 | Blog, News
Journalists at the London Times are to be congratulated for today, 4 December 2019, exposing a web of alleged money laundering centred on a company formations business based in London.
Of course, the story was originally covered by Guardian journalist Oliver Bullough in 2016 and in his 2018 book ‘Moneyland’.
The Times reported: ‘Leaked documents show links to businesses set up by Formations House, a London-based company at no. 29 Harley Street, that establishes and helps to manage companies, and scams involving more than £300 million.’
‘These include vintage wine frauds, fake stock market tipsters, dodgy gold and diamond traders, overpriced land investment schemes and a Hollywood heist carried out by a bogus aristocrat.’
One of its off-the-shelf companies dates back to 2002 and is for sale for £75,000 while a more recently incorporated company in June 2018 sells for £99.
The message for accountants is to make sure that your AML take-on procedures are thorough. The best place to stop a money launderer from becoming one of your clients is at the beginning of the business relationship.
Our new fully updated AML Policies & Procedures Manual includes a section that fully deals with these requirements and is now available here.
It is fully updated for the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts, 2010 to 2018 which came into force on 26 November 2018. It retails at €150+VAT.
See also our on-demand webinars on AML, accessible at any time.
Other webinar topics include Investment Property Accounting, FRS 105, Common Errors in FRS 102 Accounting and the latest on FRS 105 and company law, visit our online webinar training website. Once viewing is completed, customers will receive a CPD Certificate confirming their learning.
by John McCarthy Consulting Ltd. | Oct 14, 2019 | Blog
In a rare speech, Sir Donald Brydon, chair of the Future of Audit in the UK, told a packed conference room that he is a little troubled at the current mood that ‘reaches for a shotgun aimed at auditors every time there is a corporate problem’.
Speaking at the first ICAEW Audit & Assurance Faculty Audit Conference on 4 October 2019, Brydon, former chair of the London Stock Exchange, stressed the importance of balancing the responsibility and the blame for company failures between auditors, audit committees and company boards.
Ultimately, Brydon said it was directors and their actions, not auditors, that should be to blame for recent audit failures. He did not name any names but recent failures like Carillion and BHS have likely triggered this response along with other reviews.
The Brydon Future of Audit review, an independent UK government review, received 120 responses – a total of 2,500 pages of comment, while over 100 meetings and roundtables were also held to gather views.
Brydon plans to report back to the UK government on his recommendations by the end of December 2019 and all the consultation responses will be published.
In his speech, Brydon revealed that the review would seek ‘to consider how audit can become a more informative process and product whilst not losing its compliance aspect’.
Brydon insisted that it was not his intention to ‘redesign Western capitalism’, adding that, it was ‘important to note that many people and organisations have expressed their frustrations with what they see as, essentially, a narrow, backward looking and increasingly rules-obsessed approach to audit’.
He said that one of the respondents to the Review ‘compared the audit to a high jump, in which auditors have little incentive to do more than the minimum required to “clear the bar”. I repeat that there is a hunger for audit to be informative and not just evidencing compliance.’
But what does this mean for the future of Irish audit practices? Much of the audit standards that are implemented in the UK, soon follow suit here.
As they say, watch this space.
For more on best practice in Audit , see our up-to-date webinar here.
Also watch out for our new fully updated AML Policies & Procedures Manual June 2019 edition – includes the latest requirements of the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts, 2010 to 2018 which came into force on 26 November 2018
For on-demand webinars on AML and developments in Investment Property Accounting, FRS 105 – part of the Company Law Update, Common Errors in FRS 102 Accounting, visit our online webinar training website. Once viewing is completed customers will receive a CPD Certificate confirming their learning.
by John McCarthy Consulting Ltd. | Jul 29, 2019 | Blog, News
The Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts, 2010 to 2018 requires firms to report suspicious transactions based on the premise that a person ‘knows, suspects or has reasonable grounds to suspect, based on information obtained in the course of carrying on business as designated person’ that another person is involved in money laundering or terrorist financing. This is quite a low bar, as neither proof nor documentary evidence is required.
Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) are made internally within the accountancy firm to the Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) who is the only person designated by the legislation within the firm who may make an external report.
The external report is made the Garda Síochana online at GoAML and is copied to the Revenue Commissioners by post, even if it does not involve taxation.
More details on the reporting requirements are set out in our newly published AML Policies & Procedures Manual, which is available here.
It is fully updated for the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Acts, 2010 to 2018 which came into force on 26 November 2018. It retails at €150+VAT.
As regards fulfilling the training requirement, see our on-demand webinars on AML, accessible at any time.
Other webinar topics include Investment Property Accounting, FRS 105, Common Errors in FRS 102 Accounting and the latest on FRS 105 and company law, visit our online webinar training website. Once viewing is completed, customers will receive a CPD Certificate confirming their learning.
